← Ascent Boston

Horse and TaxesTier 2

at Ascent Boston

decks
6 (2.2% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
99 84-12-3
overall winrate
86.4%
ELO-adjusted winrate
88.2% avg ELO +12.7 per match
expected value
72.9% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
75.0% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↑ top
mean ELO 1498 · median 1525 · range 1326–1632 (6 pilots with an ELO rating)
971 Q1 1196 Q3 1408 1750
67% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 0% in the bottom. This deck is favored by stronger players — weight the headline winrates accordingly (the ELO-adjusted column already controls for this at the match level).
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Fire Rile 52.4% 46 36-8-2 80.4% 78.0% 79.6% +10.3
Fire Suzaku 11.5% 5 5-0-0 100.0% 77.8% 81.3% +18.0
Wind Shadowstrike 9.3% 6 6-0-0 100.0% 80.0% 85.0% +18.7
Fire Crux Mage 7.1% 4 2-2-0 50.0% 50.0% 48.8% -0.8
Fire Exia 5.9% 8 7-0-1 93.8% 79.2% 91.2% +19.8
Fire Luxem Assassin 5.9% 9 9-0-0 100.0% 84.6% 89.4% +18.2
Fire Aggro 5.2% 3 3-0-0 100.0% 71.4% 64.1% +10.5
Fire Oblation 5.2% 6 5-1-0 83.3% 70.0% 74.7% +13.2
Wind Allies 4.5% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 42.8% -11.6
Wind Seiryuu 3.7% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 63.5% +21.7
Wind Wakeup Combo 3.3% 3 3-0-0 100.0% 71.4% 70.7% +15.5
Fire Crux Lorraine 2.6% 0
Fire Suited 2.6% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 54.1% +6.6
Fire Umbra Guardian 2.6% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.1% +12.9
Fire Firebloom Burn 2.2% 0
Water Allies 2.2% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 60.2% +16.4
Water Fractal 2.2% 0
Water Genbu 2.2% 0
Fire Umbra Ranger 1.9% 0
Water Astra Ranger 1.5% 0
Wind Astra Cleric 1.1% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 63.4% +12.9
Water Aetherwing 0.7% 0
Water Crux Mage 0.7% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 69.2% +18.4
Water Umbra Guardian 0.7% 0
Wind Arcane 0.7% 0
Fire Aetherwing 0.4% 0
Fire Exia Jin 0.4% 0
Fire Kongming 0.4% 0
Fire Tera Cleric 0.4% 0
Water Exia Jin 0.4% 0
Water Neos 0.4% 0
Water Tera Cleric 0.4% 0
Water Umbra Ciel 0.4% 0
Wind Beast 0.4% 0
Wind Ciel 0.4% 0
Wind Luxem Zander 0.4% 0
Wind Neos 0.4% 0
Wind Silvie 0.4% 0
Decklists · 6 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 12 mirror matches (1 draw excluded), here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down).

No card differed in at least 3 of the 12 mirrors we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 6 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 6 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Water Resonance Bauble +0.17 2 0 10
Viridian Protective Trinket -0.17 0 2 0
Volda, Smolder's Spite -0.17 0 2 10
Embercrypt Burn +0.17 2 0 10
Stifling Trap -0.17 0 2 10
Fluffy Shopkeep +0.17 2 0 10

JSON: /api/events/32243/archetypes/Horse and Taxes